When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success. Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position.
Once actor Tom hanks said “life is a like box of chocolate, we don’t know what we are going to pick” which means life has full of inevitable obstacles that we can overcome with help of either luck or diligence. Even though many people think that success is the result of series of lucky strikes, I personally believe that success only can be achieved by the people who are diligent, hard-working without giving up and perseverant. I feel this way for two main reasons including counting on fortune is too risky and through hard-work I can achieve a lot of experience and knowledge which I cannot gain by believing in mere luck.
To begin with, relying on luck is meaningless because it is not permanent likewise any other elements of success such as hard-work, dedication, and principle. People who take a risk sacrifice all of their precious things in order to gain something. For example, one of my acquaintances who count himself as the luckiest person on earth thinks that he can pass every final exams of the university instead of preparing and giving an attention. Even though many of his classmates tried to convince that accomplishing something without hard-work is impossible, he did not want to perceive recommendations. As a consequence, he failed more than half of those examinations because of his pride.
Secondly, every achievement which is gained by the tremendous amount of effort always followed by advantages including experience, knowledge, and motivation to do further. Although several successful businessmen had good fortune in their lifetime, most of the global leading companies and entrepreneurs such as Ellon Musk, Amazon, Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg and many more have never given up on their goals. For instance, even though I was not A student in my high school I strived for my mathematical education by myself expeditiously with the aid of website especially those udemy, khanacademy, and few more. As a result, I participated in the tournament of mathematical calculus and I took the third place.
To conclude, many people claim that being successful cannot be achieved without fortune. Mostly conscientious people have a higher chance of flourishing everything including business, studies, and prominence than people who just rely on luck too much. Because of higher risk of failure and consumption.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-11 | fofty | 70 | view |
| 2018-06-14 | Yanjka | 83 | view |
| 2018-06-14 | SammyQWERTY | 76 | view |
| 2018-06-14 | Yanjka | 76 | view |
| 2018-06-14 | SammyQWERTY | 76 | view |
- color influence 86
- When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success. Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position. 76
- In some country teenager have jobs while they are still students. Do you think it is a good idea? Support your opinion by specific reasons and details to support your answer. 3
- Some students prefer to attend in a class with the teacher who has taught by before while others prefer attend in a class with new teacher. Which one do you prefer explain why, use specific details to support your answer? 76
- When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success. Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 644, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... cannot gain by believing in mere luck. To begin with, relying on luck is meanin...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, second, secondly, so, third, for example, for instance, i feel, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1973.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17847769029 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0475458829 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606299212598 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.1685228076 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.533333333 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170983090908 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534120027824 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046554782109 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0988007715948 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290208706564 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.