Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree? Or Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.
Recently, the phenomenon of giving more experimental learning instead of formal education and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that reinforcing the experimental skills might be highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the study of both experimental learning and formal education can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, developing the experimental learning can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that useful experience, as well as effective learning, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered a vital role in
academic qualifications. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both working in a laboratory and attending in conferences apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the acquisition of formal education might increase the consequences of limited knowledge. Moreover, fundamental aspects of more laboratory lessons relate to this reality that the demerits of theoretical knowledge pertain to lack of applicable materials. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of empirical knowledge is correlated negatively with experienced knowledge. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of a well-balanced education.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of giving more experimental training far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of such concept prove the significance of growing well-rounded graduates, but also pinpoint practical implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | manraj123 | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-29 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-27 | shiva_tootoonchi | 88 | view |
| 2018-10-31 | bashirheidari | 85 | view |
| 2018-06-17 | IZAD | 88 | view |
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree? 88
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. 80
- You are given climate change as the field of study. Which area will you prefer? Explain why you picked up the particular area for your study and why 11
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree? Or Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 88
- Can the Internet replace the classroom teacher Discuss your views 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eriment which discovered a vital role in academic qualifications. Thus, beneficia...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8731884058 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43695850788 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626811594203 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5376662685 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.083333333 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197374222832 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625059793147 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462726469164 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0910806642336 0.151781067708 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350307833221 0.0609392437508 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.96 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.