Some people say that computer games are bad for children by all means while others believe that these games are contributing to children's development.
Due to advancements in technological gadgets, kids activities have been shifted from outdoors to rooms. They are engrossed in playing video games. Should screen games are beneficial in children's devolpment or not? Through this eassy, I shall explore the dimensions of this topic through examples and assertion and shape up my opinion by the end.
On one side, there is a group of people who believe that computer games are very beneficial for the children. They strengthen their view point by claiming that playing video games improve the hand eye coordination, as a result kids can refine their concentration power. Moreover, children can learn various visual attention skills, when they play different kind of games. They can also learn how to follow the instructions carefully when they play games related to driving. Therefore, they can learn the lesson of multitasking and enhance their knowledge.
Contrary to this, there is a group of people who believe that screen games are bad for kids. To make their argument convincing, they claim that the eyesight of children gets weak when they play video games. They bolster their view point by saying that kids who play video games can suffer from many health related problems: obesity, headache and so on. The best epitome of this is the survey of 2010, which was conducted by british medical team, they concluded that about 62% of children in England became overweight due to playing indoor games such as video games.
Nevertheless, weighing both the opinins, I believe that there ia no single conclusion. Still, I take this ground that playing video games are important for the overall development of the child however, parents should take the responsibility for their children to play screen games for limited hours. So, that it may not affect the other facets of the life
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-26 | Love kaler | 61 | view |
| 2018-06-26 | Love kaler | 61 | view |
| 2018-06-26 | Ramandeep786 | 56 | view |
- The circular chart reveals the four main courses of land degradation and the tobular chart illustrates the different regions during the year of 1990. It shows the percentum. 56
- The bar chart below shows the results of the survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on 2 groups of workers: those aged from 18-30 ,and those aged 45-60, shows factors affecting their work performance. 56
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular uk school in 1981 ,1991 and 2001 61
- The pie chart illustrated the working in children. It shows the same circles in children working in percentage. It shows the percentum. 56
- Nowadays people throw away old things and adapt new things. Do the disadvantages of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantages? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 295, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun health seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much health', 'a good deal of health'.
Suggestion: much health; a good deal of health
...ds who play video games can suffer from many health related problems: obesity, headache and...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 301, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...to play screen games for limited hours. So, that it may not affect the other facets of t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, then, therefore, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07284768212 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58211062777 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55298013245 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6169612638 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.75 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5625 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22980664805 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892053816368 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948689580317 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151870669402 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486803539405 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.