The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001
The given circular chats depict the information about the total expenditure of five different amounts for a UK schooled in three years: 1981,1991 and 2001. The data is calibrated in percentum. Which is clear and coherently represented.
It can be seen that the maximum amount one forth was used for teachers salaries in the year of 1981 whereas, In the year of 1991 had been increased (10%). In addition to this the minimum amount atiny fraction were comsumed for insurance in the year of 198, but In the year of 1991 had been inclined(1%). However, In the year of 1981 were used amount more than quatar for other workers salaries, and In the year of 1991 had been comsumed(22%) respectively.
On the other hand rhe highest amount(45%) were used for teachers salaries, and the resources e.g books had been(9%). Moreover, furniture, and equipment witnessed a sharp fall of(10%) in the first ten year, and surged to under a quater in 2001.
Overall, it is evident that the maximum money was spent on teachers salaries, and the minimum amount were used for insurance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Sandhu param | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 67 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991, 2001. 67
- Some people say that computer games are bad for children by all means other believe that these games are contributed to children development.the discuss both view and give your apinion 67
- The diagrams below show how glass containers , such as bottles , are produced and recycled. 61
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001 73
- The diagrams below show how glass containers , such as bottles , are produced and recycled. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, whereas, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83516483516 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59787285376 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549450549451 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2589104501 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7777777778 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108657569496 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467078448466 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686639711323 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0704343987049 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073064313563 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.