The graph illustrates the number of daily hours which had been spent by UK population (over 4 old) on watching TV and listing Radio in the interval of Oct to Dec 1992
It can be clearly seen that the peak point reached to about 46% of population who spending about 20 hour per day on watching TV, while the lowest point had been recorded about 3% of population at 2 hours daily of watching. In addition to the line has a dramatically increases, where it up and down suddenly.
On other hand, about 25% of population had spent their time in listing the Radio recorded the highest number of daily hours about 8 hours, while the break point reached about 3% who listen to Radio 1 hour daily. Also, this line has similar to the first line for the issue of up and down.
In conclusion, it is obviously that UK population who watching TV spent time more than who they listen to Radio.
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The following bar chart gives statistics showing the aspects of quality of life in five countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Wri 72
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The following bar chart gives statistics showing the aspects of quality of life in five countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Wri 56
- The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U.S. from 1960 to 2011. 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison whre relevant. 73
- The line graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 101, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hour' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hours'.
Suggestion: hours
...46% of population who spending about 20 hour per day on watching TV, while the lowes...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 722.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.40243902439 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36619937127 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548780487805 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 117.396763158 43.030603864 273% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 144.4 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8 22.9334400587 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115030489742 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067735722954 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0219986838804 0.0843802449381 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0763205630232 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330167139464 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.38 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.