The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.

The graph describes the amount of goods brought into UK by rail, water, road and pipeline route between 1974 and 2002. During this period, highest amount of goods were transported into the country by road.

As can be seen clearly, around 70 million tonnes of goods were transported through road in 1974, which was also highest quantity to be carried amongst all the different routes. This figure rose to 80 million tonnes in period between 1990 to 1998. By year 2002, close to 100 million tonnes of goods was transported by roads.

On the other hand, nearly 40 million tonnes of goods were transported by water and rail routes in 1974. This quantity remained same by 2002, except for a drop in 1986 and 1994, when only 30 million tonnes was transported. As opposed to that, the water route was used increasingly to transport goods, with load rising to close to 60 million tonnes in 1982 and 1994. However, the quantity fell to 50 million tonnes in 1998, before rising over 60 million tonnes in 2002. Similarly, the pipeline route also saw a steady rise in its preference, carrying 20 million tonnes in year 2002. But despite the increase, it remained the least favoured route throughout the 28 year period.

In conclusion, roads continued to carry maximum quantity of goods into UK, whereas, pipelines were preferred rarely as a mode of transport.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the highest'.
Suggestion: , the highest
...etween 1974 and 2002. During this period, highest amount of goods were transported into t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'also the highest'.
Suggestion: also the highest
...sported through road in 1974, which was also highest quantity to be carried amongst all the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 582, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...arrying 20 million tonnes in year 2002. Although, it remained the least favoured route ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 622, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Although, it remained the least favoured route throughout the 28 year period. ...
^^
Line 7, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...referred rarely as a mode of transport.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, similarly, so, whereas, except for, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1116.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87336244541 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4407003838 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550218340611 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1215131684 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276976363406 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117800228973 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799191311575 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20785970888 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518488332425 0.0819641961636 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.