The supplied three pie charts depicts percentage of annual spending by local government in Someland in three decades (1980, 1990 and 2000), divided into 6 sectors. It is clearly seen from the all pie charts, that Higher education have been supported the most, in contrast to Other sector when percentage of the money spent was the lowest.
Higher education was over three decades in 1980, 1990 and 2000 supported by local authorities in Someland more than any other sector, 35, 45 and 40 per cent respectively. Second most financially empowered sector in Someland was K-12 education where numbers were average 21 per cent.
However, Transportation have been extremely affected in 1990, when local government invested 10 per cent less than ten years before. Nevertheless, the lowest investment into the transport in 1990, in 2000 percentage of money spent raised to 22 per cent. health and human resources, environmental resources and other have not represent major changes in showed period.
- As E-books are available online these days, the value of printed books has diminished. Agree or disagree? 84
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years. 56
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 73
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people believe that it is the responsibility of individuals to take care of their own health and diet. Others however believe that governments should make sure that their citizens have a healthy diet. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 255, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Health
...e of money spent raised to 22 per cent. health and human resources, environmental reso...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 326, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'represented'.
Suggestion: represented
...ironmental resources and other have not represent major changes in showed period.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, nevertheless, second, so, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27044025157 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73361435516 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622641509434 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.5957585772 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 119.714285714 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22297424714 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107983479122 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102217589723 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15479999319 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554820898246 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.