In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Due to increasing consumption of fast food, number of medical patient have gone up very rapidly in last few decades. To which, may people believe that high tax duties by government can prevent the issue before it slips from the hand. In my opinion, raising tax can play a role to certain degree but it is certainly not an ideal approach to mitigate the problem.
To begin with, increasing tax rate can assist in pushing a part of the people away from fast food, especially students and children. When tax duty goes up, the prices will increase so people may rely other sources of food, such as cooking by themselves, rather than unhealthy fast foods. For example, when governments have imposed a huge tax on cigarettes, gradually number of smokers are decreased. Thus, it can assist to discourage people from eating fast food to some extent.
However, it is surely not addressing the issue at root level, which is essential to fix the problem effectively. Imposing heavy tax would simply put burden on economically backward classes because rich people still can afford it. At the same time, it puts huge financial pressure on businesses, which is a source of employment for several thousand people. For instance, when authorities raised Tax on easy to prepare food, 20, 000 people lost their job as a part of cost cutting. Instead, other effective ways should be identify and encourage.
On the contrary, the most efficient solution can be a good food standards. When strict food regulation are applied and enough is invested in its governance, more impact can be seen. Furthermore, food awareness programs should be initiated to educate citizens about the food content so that they can identify best for themselves. This will be a win-win situation for both business and its consumers.
In Conclusion, although high tax on junk food can demoralize its intake, it surely not an ideal solution. Thus, other approaches are selected and promoted for a long term fruitful solution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | aeropiyush | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | Vivek kachhadiya | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Thaonguyen1409 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | smelias339 | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-25 | bhatvishal@ | 56 | view |
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?Gi 84
- Write a letter complaining about the dirty roads and garbage in your street Why it is effect and problem What is the main causes Your suggestions 82
- The cultures of many countries around the world becomes more similar than they used to be.What are the reasons for this trend?Is it positive or negative? 56
- Nowadays people have free access to music and films online. Is this a positive or a negative development?Provide relevant examples from you own experience. 78
- Many people like to wear fashionable clothes. Why do you think this is a case? Is this a good thing or a bad thing? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 521, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'identified'?
Suggestion: identified
...Instead, other effective ways should be identify and encourage. On the contrary, the ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66222124871 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60843373494 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.2322544904 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.2222222222 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27777777778 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283685559187 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090288187685 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631784377481 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157446897303 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769749699146 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.