The illustration indicates percentage of old people aged 65 and over in all citizen in the past, present and for prediction future – from 1940-2040 in Japan, Sweden and the U.S.A.
A glance at the feature provided reveals the number of individuals aged 65 and over is generally rising gradually but more drastically from 2030s. The aged populace would be rocket up to a quarter in all given countries. However, a various changes was took in the periods, in 2040 the percentages of the older people in citizens might be same.
As regard of Sweden and the U.S.A, in the 1940 the elder people had occupied around 9% and 7% respectively in all populations, merely 2% difference. But, by the 1990s Sweden’s the senile residents had overtook the U.S.A’s residents, then in 2010s distinction between had become larger – approximately 16%. However, the calculation presumed from the 2025s the countries elder citizens difference between them would narrow down, and the growth of older people would also steadily rise to about 25% in the both nations until 2040.
On the other hand, the elders in Japan was only 5% of citizens in 1940. 20 years later the residents had decreased to marginally 3% then continued until 1990s. In next 30 years the rise of the senile is showing uniform increment, maybe standing at 10%. Surprisingly, the number of the elder people would be jumping from 10-27% in only 10 years period time which means 2040.
- The pie charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- People should follow the customs and traditions when people start to live a new country To what extent do you agree or disagree 44
- the graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 67
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 241, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'change'?
Suggestion: change
...all given countries. However, a various changes was took in the periods, in 2040 the pe...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 253, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...untries. However, a various changes was took in the periods, in 2040 the percentages...
^^^^
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
... same. As regard of Sweden and the U.S.A, in the 1940 the elder people had occup...
^
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'overtaken'.
Suggestion: overtaken
... Sweden's the senile residents had overtook the U.S.A's residents, then in 201...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A&apos
...e senile residents had overtook the U.S.A's residents, then in 2010s distinction ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 2010s'.
Suggestion: in the 2010s
...ertook the U.S.A's residents, then in 2010s distinction between had become larger –...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1202.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9262295082 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72634336286 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590163934426 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.2370644765 43.030603864 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.2 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174264022232 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596118241777 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511487173448 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11415301199 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479754280277 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.