The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The line graph illustrates information about how much fish and various kinds of meat, namely chicken, beef and lamb was consumed per person per week in a European country in over a period of 25 years from 1979 to 2004.
In general, while the amount of chicken consumed increased significantly, the opposite was true for the figures for beef, lamb and fish. Meanwhile, the consumption of fish was lowest.
In 1979, the amount of beef consumed was ranked in first place at about 220 grams per person per week, making it higher than the lamb and chicken consumption, at about 150 grams in each category. Meanwhile, around 60 grams fish was eaten.
Over the period, the amount of chicken which was consumsed rose considerably to around 250 grams in 2004. Conversely, the opposite pattern was seen for the figure for beef which dropped significantly to nearby 110 grams by 2004. Likewise, a substantial decrease to approximately 60 grams was seen in the amount of lamb consumsed. Similarly, there was a slight fall to under 50 grams in the consumption of fish.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Lovepreet123 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | anasrafiq | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 56
- Some people think that schools should reward students who have the best academic results, while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show progress. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, if, likewise, similarly, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89502762431 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71377031299 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524861878453 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8917099995 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4444444444 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126296263107 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603508339466 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051855528675 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0928362307706 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522975239078 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.