Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree?
Of late, there has been a colossal upssurge aamong the prodigies discussing the importance of experiental learning over formal education. Some people think that formal learning is better than experiental learning while others maintain that experiental learning bestows numerous benefits. This essay will discuss that why experiental learning is way better than formal learning.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments associated with experiental learning. Firstly, the most conspicuous is that experiental learning being the practical way of grasping knowledge provides more clarity, conceptualization and a better insight about the theoractical things being taught. For instance, a student will have a better understanding of Newton’s law of action and reaction when taught with practical examples. As a result, it is quite evident that theoratical knowledge coupled with practical methodology provides students a far more better understanding.
On the other hand, another pivotal facet of this argument that proponents are not cognizant is the applicability of knowledge in practical life. Not only the knowledge gained through theoratical means is going to have less applicability in practical life rather pupils are going to face hindrances in its further implication. Besides, knowledge learnt through experience and practical means will impart the students all in and out of the subject. As a matter of fact, it is unquestionable that experiential learning has far more benefits than formal means of learning.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds that the benefits of experiential learning outrun the formal education due to better understanding, concepts and applicability imparted in practical life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | manraj123 | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
- Some people spend too much time on work than their personal/private life and experience time shortage. What problems does it cause. 73
- The importance of cars and airplanes in modern life. Give examples. 72
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer. 80
- In your opinion what incentives could be offered that would persuade more people to embrace electric cars 84
- In spite of advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why? what are the solutions?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to while'
Suggestion: to while
...ing is better than experiental learning while others maintain that experiental learni...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to be'.
Suggestion: to be
...onspicuous is that experiental learning being the practical way of grasping knowledge...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...cal methodology provides students a far more better understanding. On the other hand, a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to outrun'
Suggestion: to outrun
...t the benefits of experiential learning outrun the formal education due to better unde...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, if, so, while, for instance, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88537549407 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2398773336 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533596837945 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 449.1 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7513796657 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.083333333 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.25397266985 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117850080938 0.242375264174 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519625173236 0.0925447433944 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593890950561 0.071462118173 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0810419957058 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662152740444 0.0609392437508 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.