The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the results of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.Summ

The table chart gives information about the complete count of visitors who visit Ashdown Museum during both years pre and post refurbishment. The pie charts illustrate the visitor's satisfaction levels surveyed during the same periods.

Overall, it can be overserved that after refurbishment, the total number of visitors in this museum increased significantly and they tend to feel more satisfied with dropping by Ashdown Museum due to such improvements.

As for the total number of participants or audiences at Ashdown museum, they were 74,000 people during the year before it was refurbished. However, its figure showed a considerable soar to more or less 92,000 after refurbishment.

In light of to the extent of satisfaction about going to the cultural organisation, before there were any renovations, nearly half of total visitors responded that they felt dissatisfied, precisely, 40 for dissatisfaction and 10 for very discontent. However, after the advancement processes, those figures experienced a significant drop with 20.

In contrast, there were completely opposite patterns regarding the results of the survey. Previously, 30 museum-goers answered that they were satisfied with enjoying visiting the museum and only 15 people said they were very satisfied. On the contrary, after the reforms, over a third visitors delighted to go to the place, which was the most substantial number of visitors and those who said very satisfied accounted for over a double number. In the meantime, there were people who did not answer the question at all in both periods with five people who were the lowest numbers among all visitors in the different periods.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'visitors'' or 'visitor's'?
Suggestion: visitors'; visitor's
...bishment. The pie charts illustrate the visitors satisfaction levels surveyed during the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xperienced a significant drop with 20. In contrast, there were completely oppos...
^^^
Line 9, column 286, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'visitor'?
Suggestion: visitor
...ntrary, after the reforms, over a third visitors delighted to go to the place, which was...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, third, as for, in contrast, more or less, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 965.302439024 147% => OK
No of words: 260.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44615384615 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04959983795 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 106.607317073 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569230769231 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 283.868780488 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3310939389 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.727272727 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438276413861 0.215688989381 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158850425975 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811688508659 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231229429407 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867317694636 0.0819641961636 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.