The graph below shows the average growth in domestic products in wealthy countries, countries that have adopted a global approach to business and countries that have not.

The given bar chart reveals about the average increase in the indigenous goods in affluent countries and the others over four decades.
Ostensibly, in 1996s, the average GDP growth reached its peak by approximately five percent growth for opulent nations. The consequent rates in 1970s,1980s and 1990s are 3,2 and 1.5 percent, respectively. This manifests a gradual decrease which could be a factor with a grave significance. In the 1970s, the indices of GDP average boost are in the vicinity of three percent for the wealthy countries and globalisers .Whilst the growth percentage has significantly declined for the former, the same rate for the latter has almost been tripled compared to the previous decade. The GDP percentage for non-globalizers has faced a lack of stability since the 1960s as there were no obvious patterns for the changes. In addition, the minimal GDP increment for non-globalisers was in the 1980s which was only one percent. On the other hand, the most conspicuous growth was in the 1990s for globalisers regarding five percent growth.
Overall, the Average annual gross domestic product growth, known as GDP, had always been facing diverse changes from the 1960s to the 1990s.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 141, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1970s'.
Suggestion: in the 1970s
...r opulent nations. The consequent rates in 1970s,1980s and 1990s are 3,2 and 1.5 percent...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 415, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...or the wealthy countries and globalisers .Whilst the growth percentage has signifi...
^^
Line 2, column 417, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Whilst
... the wealthy countries and globalisers .Whilst the growth percentage has significantly...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 582, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...compared to the previous decade. The GDP percentage for non-globalizers has faced...
^^
Line 2, column 770, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inimal GDP increment for non-globalisers was in the 1980s which was only one perc...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18461538462 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8399609224 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620512820513 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9868947464 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.333333333 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129907215001 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534031668279 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445914687911 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0972674646869 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0113274655972 0.0819641961636 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.