At work or school, you might encounter a problem that requires creativity -for example, you are given a task to complete that is very different from other tasks you do. In work or school situation that requires you to think creatively, would you prefer to work alone or with others? Why?
Life difficultés definitely come in different forms and shapes and they can be sweet or painful as well. No one can escape some kinds of problems, which accompany us in the whole life. Arguably, success is one of the most important goals that every mature human being has to admit that success will be a blank dream without difficulties. Some people prefer to work individually when running into a huge problem. But others take a radically different view and prefer to work in a group in order to think creatively. However, the popular sentiment to which I vehemently cling is that working in the group is highly beneficial for people because it helps them do their tasks precisely and completely. The underlying aim of this essay is to put forward some cogent reasons to shed light on a number of issues in this framework.
To commence with, life is full of trials and tribulations and people bend over backward to face different difficulties successfully because overcome obstacles and barriers is a key element when thinking of success. Generally phrased, these problems not only can be solved in the group meticulously and punctiliously but also can help people think creatively and wisely. As a palpable example, when people run into a huge problem and are willing to resolve it solely, they might not be able to think deeply and some positive and negative consequences will not come to their mind in the spur of the moment. So, working exclusively prevents people from making a progress day in day out and achieve a conspicuous success. To elucidate more on this issue, working in a group provides fertile ground for humans to go through discussion, share ideas, find weaknesses, and resolve them vigorously.
Another equally salient point in corroborating my stance on this subject is that not only can people work properly in the group but also can improve their social skills. If we take a minute to ponder over it, myriads of people prefer to work in the group, so, a great opportunity will be provided for individuals to become familiar with others with diverse attitudes and passions. It can be deduced from a combination of breadth of coverage and depth of detail that not only can individuals improve their working quality in the group but also can socialize and develop their social activities.
However, every coin has two sides. The startling fact which flabbergasted and bewildered me is that majorities of humans think working in the group is always advantageous. Indeed, there are crowds of people who work properly and creatively in solitude. For instance, working individually will allow people to stay focus and concentrate on their tasks. However, it was a story in a nutshell; actually, there are more reasonable grounds that can lend weight to my personal perspective.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
- People should only read those books that are about real events, real people and established facts. Do you agree or disagree? 76
- TPO 45 3
- Would you rather have the university assign a student to share a room or choose by yourself? 76
- "Two years ago the city voted to prohibit skateboarding in Central Plaza. They claimed that skateboard users were responsible for the litter and vandalism that were keeping other visitors from coming to the plaza. In the past two years, however, there has 29
- Never, never give up, means to keep trying and never stop working for your goals. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, so, well, as to, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2385.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 477.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80504241442 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517819706499 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 752.4 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4963176242 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.571428571 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.45110844103 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125179086849 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436420078076 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409610628703 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0687833739155 0.150856017488 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382241576605 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.