The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the uk devided into three categories, from 1995 -2002. summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevent.
The bar chart illustrates the information of average telephone calls in minutes categorized by local, national and international fixed line and all calls of mobiles in UK between 1995 and 2002. Units are measured in billions.
Overall, it is clear from that local fixed line calls are significantly highest among other calls with some fluctuations. In comparison, national and international calls and all calls from mobiles have dramatically increasing over the given period.
Local fixed line calls are more than 70billion minutes in 1995. Then there were slight increase for the next four years and reached at the peak in 1999 with 90 billion minutes. Then, the account of local calls declined in the following years and reached almost same at the beginning years rate. Although, which is 10 billion minutes higher than national and international fixed calls.
In 1995, the account of national and international calls was about 37 billion minutes, which is went up systematically in the upcoming years. As is observed, the graph was about 50billion minutes in 1999 and surged to just above 60 billion minutes by the year of 2002. Moreover, mobile calls consist of approximately 2billion minutes in 1995 , and remained below 10 billion minutes up to the year of 1998. While, in 1999 the ratio escalated over 10 billion minutes and continuously grow up and finished with about 45 billion minutes in 2002.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-25 | minakatori | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-25 | Calvinthebeast | 84 | view |
| 2018-09-13 | eyraen | 73 | view |
- The chart below provides information on the methods of waste disposal in four European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Directors of large companies receive much higher salaries than ordinary employees do Some people think it s necessary but others holds it is unfair Discuss both perspectives and give your opinion 73
- The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009
- The chart below shows changes in three different areas of crime in manchester city centre from 2003 to 2012 79
- Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication such as letters, email, or telephone calls.How far you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of local calls declined in the following years and reached almost same at the beg...
^^
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s went up systematically in the upcoming years. As is observed, the graph was abo...
^^
Line 7, column 343, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...f approximately 2billion minutes in 1995 , and remained below 10 billion minutes u...
^^
Line 7, column 422, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s up to the year of 1998. While, in 1999 the ratio escalated over 10 billion minu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1187.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16086956522 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77347655221 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517391304348 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 351.9 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1715422497 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9166666667 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.41666666667 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228023162397 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922465264653 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602239004406 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150017955069 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483182822042 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.