The bar chart below shows the three main causes of land damage in four different areas in the world.
The column graph illustrates the main reasons for land damage in four different regions in four corners of the world namely Africa, Asia, Australia, and Europe.
Looking at the bar chart, it is obvious that Africa and Asia are suffering more from land farm degradation than the other regions. Additionally, it is also clear, Australia and Europe are always eco-friendly.
To begin with, we can see the most serious reason for all main causes is breeding in Africa, which makes 500 million hectares of land become useless. Moreover, this action is also taken by the other regions with a slighter degree. It is clear that 380 million hectares are destroyed by Asia, Australia and Europe are responsibility for aproximately 220 and 110 million hectares respectively. When it comes to cutting down trees, Asia overtakes Africa to become the most serious destroyer, with over 420 million hectares damaged, which is also the highest figure of this sector. Besides, Africa contributes to land damage around 300 million hectares while Australia and Europe contunue to take the least number, with 100 million hectares equally.
In terms of farming, this activity has a similar trend as tree-cutting but the figures are different. The bar chart shows that Asia and Africa still the main damage destroying the land, with 430 million hectares by the former and 300 million hectares by the later. In contrast, Australia and Europe do more environmental-friendly cropping activites, only about 60 and 80 million hectares respectively, which are the lowest figures of these sectors.
- The first car appeared on British roads in 1888. By the year 2000, there may be as many as 29 million vehicles on the British roads. Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use. 67
- Environment is always a greatly sensible issues that people have an controversial argument with each other. It is believed that responsibility of resolving serious environmental degradation should belong to a global organization instead of a internal gove 61
- The table illustrates the amount of energy production by five types of fuel in the UK in three different years 1990, 1996 and 2000 measured million tonnes. 67
- People attend college or university for many different reasons . Why do you think people attend college or university? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 56
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments andlarge companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree ordisagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...egions. Additionally, it is also clear, Australia and Europe are always eco-frie...
^^
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctares of land become useless. Moreover, this action is also taken by the other r...
^^
Line 3, column 716, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... contunue to take the least number, with 100 million hectares equally. In terms ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, look, moreover, so, still, while, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1320.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21739130435 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83140824101 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553359683794 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 283.868780488 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8568820177 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63636363636 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16830656616 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695378152035 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931050756069 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136820148979 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832245706144 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.