As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on the road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that the user should pay for the cost. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
One very complex issue in today's world is the funding of the road network. While many tend to see it as the government's duty, I also believe that there is also a case for saying that the government and the car drivers should be jointly responsible for the cost.
On the one hand, there is a contention in some circles that infrastructure development should be paid by the state. Primarily, proponents of state funding cite that it is the government who needs to be in charge of covering the cost as residents already pay money to these road developing projects through the national tax systems. From the macro perspective, constructing a large-scale road network acts as a precursor to the economic expansion of a region and therefore, the government should invest in such massive projects to boost the GDP growth. This is particularly valid in Viet Nam, as the construction of the extensive highway network connecting Sai Gon and western provinces is instrumental in accelerating the economic progress in Mekong Delta region.
In spite of the above arguments, I support the view that car drivers should make a greater contribution to the highway construction and maintenance. At the outset, it is universally accepted that the number of road users is very large compared to the taxpayers, especially in countries with the high volume of traffic. Individual's over-exploitation of the road system will, in fact, add a higher tax burden on workers and can eventually stifle economic growth. These painful lessons, shown by nations such as Vietnam and China, seem to demonstrate complete sponsor by the government is economically unsustainable. A further issue relates to globalization, characterized by the expansion of free movement among countries. If this means that the taxpayers (belong to) of one nation are now obliged to bear the full cost of building roads while users from other countries also benefit from the resources without contributing their fair share, this is surely a further significant factor which clearly makes state-sponsored road projects impractical.
From the issues outlined above, one can conclude that even though government subsidies are necessary to develop road system, other methods need to be supplemented, such as private organizations due to costs and globalization.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-14 | Jay1708 | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-12 | minh2001 | 56 | view |
| 2018-10-10 | huongquynh | 78 | view |
| 2018-09-21 | phuong cao | 89 | view |
| 2018-05-27 | drtruong92 | 56 | view |
- Some people believe that school children should not be given homework by their teachers, whereas others argue that homework plays an important role in the education of children. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 89
- Some people believe that school children should not be given homework by their teachers, whereas others argue that homework plays an important role in the education of children. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 89
- As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on the road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that the user should pay for the cost. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...twork. While many tend to see it as the governments duty, I also believe that there is also...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, while, in fact, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1940.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25745257453 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14350994999 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566395663957 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.2419406156 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.230769231 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3846153846 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07692307692 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221486815524 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711290906076 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568239956116 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133437198468 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474723624206 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.