Do you agree or disagree? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today?
Nowadays, everyone is using car, they all have private cars. Since, the world is growing, humanity create, and expand cities where they live, so to make easier the transportation, they invented the cars. With the vehicles they are able to reach everywhere. Also, they create the public cars, such as buses. There is an argument that states in twenty years there will be a fewer cars in use than there are today. I strongly agree with that opinion for two reasons, which I will explain in the following essay.
First of all, the reason to be mention is teleportation. Humanity is improving themselves, and they are also greedy. Every invention invoke the other invention. Sometimes as a requisite, or need they invent the new things. Today we are able to see people travel for plenty of reasons. The streets and world are very large, when they have an emergent they should be faster. For that reason, teleportation will be invented. It will make our lives easier, since we can get to any place we want in a seconds. For example, people can visit their friends and families who live in another city where is far away. People might claim conversely it will increase the number of cars, but it is not true. Increasing the number of cars will not be a solution to long distance problem, that is why teleportation will be used. Thus, I believe with the presence of teleportation the number of cars in use will be fewer.
Furthermore, the second reason is pollution. Cars work with fuel, and they release a dirty chemical gases, that damage the atmosphere, and the environment. Even today a significant ratio of the ozone layer is damaged, and got thinner. For the following days maybe there will be a big environmental problems, such as extinction of some animals, and depletion of natural resources. For that reason, the scientist will tend to find a solution to that dilemma. For instance, I read in my course book from social sciences, scientist claim we should decrease the number of private cars, and use the public transportation, otherwise the pollution will be a huge problem for the sake of world. Hence, in my view in the future, there will be a fewer cars to save the environment, because the population is increasing and if every citizen get a car the world might not endure that much pollution. Peoples will realize, decrease the number of cars.
In nut shell, I believe in twenty years there will be fewer cars in use, because the progressing humanity will find an aspect for the teleportation, and to decrease the pollution they will leave their cars, and develop an alternative solution such as public transportation which is more beneficial instead of having a number of cars with respect to number of people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | prakriti malla | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. 70
- Summarize the risk takers articles? 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. 66
- the positive and negative impacts of the eco torism? 78
- eco- toruism? 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rivate cars. Since, the world is growing , humanity create, and expand cities wher...
^^
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...irst of all, the reason to be mention is teleportation. Humanity is improving the...
^^
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'invokes'.
Suggestion: invokes
...d they are also greedy. Every invention invoke the other invention. Sometimes as a req...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a second' or simply 'seconds'?
Suggestion: a second; seconds
...ince we can get to any place we want in a seconds. For example, people can visit their fr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'gas'?
Suggestion: gas
...fuel, and they release a dirty chemical gases, that damage the atmosphere, and the en...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'problem'?
Suggestion: problem
...maybe there will be a big environmental problems, such as extinction of some animals, a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be a big environmental problems, such as extinction of some animals, and depletio...
^^
Line 5, column 459, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...end to find a solution to that dilemma. For instance, I read in my course book from...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, second, so, thus, for example, for instance, such as, first of all, in my view, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 9.8082437276 234% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 8.0752688172 334% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2261.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 471.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80042462845 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69570713102 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484076433121 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 710.1 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 11.0 1.86738351254 589% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 68.8435334564 48.9658058833 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7407407407 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7037037037 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303810543366 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874187930658 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118975785309 0.0737576698707 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216629986769 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271861396025 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.