The two given pie chart illustrate the percentage of money that was spent and received for children's charity located in the USA during a year.
It is clear that donated food was the strongest revenue resources. And, the highest percentage of expenditure belonged to some kind of program services.
There are a various sources that contributed for children's charity. Donated food was 86.6% which was the largest number when comparing with others. Community contributions occupied one tenth in total, 10.4% - to be precise. Children in this charity organisation was also supported from some program revenue about 0.2%. Investment incomes, government grants, other incomes were much more smaller about 0.2%, 0.2% and 0.4% respectively.
Expenditure was divided in three main activities. First, as mentioned above, the number of program service was 95.8%, which was on the top. Second, furdraising was 2.6%. Finally, management and general was just only 1.6%.
- The chart below shows the amount of time that 10 to 15-year-olds spend chatting on the Internet and playing on games consoles on an average school day in the UK. 56
- The chart below shows the average hours worked per day by married men and women in paid employment. 73
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 93
- The tables below give information about the world population and distribution in 1950 and 2000, with an estimate of the situation in 2050. Summarise the information. 73
- In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 21, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'source'?
Suggestion: source
...ogram services. There are a various sources that contributed for childrens charity....
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...also supported from some program revenue about 0.2%. Investment incomes, governme...
^^
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'smaller' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: smaller
...ernment grants, other incomes were much more smaller about 0.2%, 0.2% and 0.4% respectively....
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, second, so, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 816.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 148.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51351351351 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48791127476 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74367800943 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.722972972973 0.547539520022 132% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.1075591557 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.0 112.824112599 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.3333333333 22.9334400587 54% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11916968809 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435208194808 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.090376494794 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101100665404 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135871164758 0.0819641961636 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.79 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.