After industrial revolution the amount of production was risen by factories due to high level of needs. In terms of this increase, transportation which was a significant necessity in that time became to an important issue. Factories had to transport their products to different cities to earn money and by the technology in that time the most secure transportation way was trains. Trains could transport high amount of the products easily and safety, because of this reason governments to help their economy and their industry had to improve their rail road system. In addition, by invention of car and using this invention in high ranges in transportation some governments change their perspective and start to investment in highways and public transport. In my opinion improving the train system could be more important than spent money in public system and in this essay, I will argue these two views.
According to many, trains because of their railroad system and their stable speed, the risk of accidents are less than other transportation vehicles. On the other hand, thanks to technology, nowadays there are different varieties of trains due to their using aim and this possibility give more advantages. Also, trains that use in city’s public transportation by using electricity are more green or environmental friendly vehicles.
Other people think that, improving public transportations like, bus, highways and etc. is more important owing to high expectancy of people and the high velocity. Despite the fact that improving rail system could decrease the risk of accidents, roads that use by cars or buses can give freedom to people’s movements. Moreover, this improvement in roads and public transportation can ease the life of people who live in country side. The increasing of migration to cities from country side by using roads could be an ideal example.
As a conclusion, spending money to improve railway system and train technology could help the economy of countries among the public transportation. In addition, trains due to their performance are more environmental friendly.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- It has been said that the world is becoming a global village in which there are no boundaries to trade and communication. Do the benefits of globalisation outweigh the drawbacks? 84
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 67
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transportDisucss both the 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
After industrial revolution the amount of pro...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...lic transportations like, bus, highways and etc. is more important owing to high expecta...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, in addition, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34131736527 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00999327602 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488023952096 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9517524596 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3125 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147714488522 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592706785007 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054369828108 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109198846584 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381292855319 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.