Do you agree or disagree? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.
Over the past few decades, the issue of whether traveling in a group by tour leader has received a great deal of attention. Although some may argue that tour guide can be important due to the fact that they are familiar with the challenges through the route, I as well as many others believe that traveling with a leader could be limited and in some cases, it could create hard situations. I am of the opinion that both of the mentioned viewpoints have their own merits and drawbacks, and the following explanations will further elaborate on this perspective.
First and foremost, without a shadow of doubt, all the human in the world respect liberty and they have been fighting throughout history to gain this valuation. It is sometimes argued that having a leader, usually and not in a crucial situation, constraint people to do their favorite works. All around the world, definitely, people travel to other places to fresh their mind, meeting new culture and communicate with other societies. The tour leader might limits tourists to do their enjoyable works in order to follow a specific schedule. For the purpose of illustration, I had registered to travel around the Europe by a group and a leader, and when I decided to visit Amsterdam, the leader did not allow me due to the reason that Amsterdam was not in the tour leader schedule.
Furthermore, it has been establish beyond the doubt that traveling brings people enjoyable times and they prefer to be away from stress. It is axiomatic that by traveling with a group and a leader, one can face a significant problem in communicating with other members of the group due to the differentiate through their beliefs and their interests. As a case of point, my cousin had traveled by a group to Spain. One member of the group had insisted to visit all the churches, in spite of not being in the schedule, and had made a hard time for other members of the groups.
On the other hand, it is documented that when people travel to someplace new, they do not familiar with its monuments and famous places. having a tour leader, people can avoid getting lost in a stranger country and they do not waste their time finding specific places. In addition, the tour leader knows the cheapest place for resting which is vital for people due to the limitation of their budgets.
In brief, Contemplating all aforementioned reasons, one can draw the conclusion that traveling by a group and having the leader is not a good idea chiefly due to the having liberty to decisions in travel and non-stressful time reasons.
- TPO 44-Suspicious coins 76
- TPO35-Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age. 70
- TPO 22- Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom 73
- TPO27-Little Ice age 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'established'.
Suggestion: established
...r schedule. Furthermore, it has been establish beyond the doubt that traveling brings ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... with other members of the group due to the differentiate through their beliefs and their interes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Having
...r with its monuments and famous places. having a tour leader, people can avoid getting...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, so, well, in addition, in brief, as well as, in some cases, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2124.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77303370787 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68254373756 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47191011236 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 642.6 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.1439938416 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.75 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8125 20.6045352989 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157290116679 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064062119304 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389313575639 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101116064358 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00847006236541 0.0645574589148 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 58.1214874552 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.002688172 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.247311828 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.