In many countries, governments are spending a large amount of money on improving internet access. Why is it happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money?
It’s true that in many countries, governments are investing strongly in expanding internet access. There are some reasons for this trend and while I agree that it has plus points, I would argue that many different key factors need to be prioritized by public funding.
On the one hand, there are two main explains why governments spend more priorities on accessing internet. First and foremost, from the social perspective, this would broaden citizen’s horizon. For example, many knowledge resources or online courses are available on the internet that people easily access to learn and research. Another significant reason comes from the economic perspective, internet boosts the international cooperation that leads to increase the economic development. In particular, the internet supports foreign companies could contact and connect constantly; therefore they could expand their investigation to different areas.
On the other hand, although internet has many benefits, It seems to me that there are many different important things need prioritize than improving internet access. Firstly, governments should spend money on the factors that impacts directly to demand of citizens. For instance, the more schools or hospitals are constructed the more people could have chances to have a better standard living. Additional, polluted environment has become a serious problem that should be concerned by national and local authorities. By investing money on researching renewable energy resources, governments could reduce carbon footprint from burning fossil fuels which are a main reason of air pollution and climate change.
In conclusion, governments prioritize expenditure on accessing internet as some benefits; however I believe that there are many other fields which should be increased more spending by government.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | sonyielts | 89 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | quynquyn1202 | 89 | view |
| 2019-04-12 | Harik80 | 84 | view |
| 2019-03-21 | bminhanh01 | 89 | view |
| 2018-11-21 | quynhquynh | 78 | view |
- The charts compare 5 different sources of energy in the USA in 1980 and 1990. 67
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds Do you agree or disagree about this opinion 78
- People in the community can buy cheaper products nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- In many countries, governments are spending a large amount of money on improving internet access. Why is it happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... it has plus points, I would argue that many different key factors need to be prioritized by p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 32, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'mains'?
Suggestion: mains
...unding. On the one hand, there are two main explains why governments spend more pri...
^^^^
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...benefits, It seems to me that there are many different important things need prioritize than i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77490774908 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94377536066 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590405904059 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8256931162 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.384615385 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257590216342 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957265347841 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873696105624 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162176769225 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206984909452 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.