Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this can not be changed, while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Although it believed that we, as humans, have made it too late to take corrective actions to protect the plants and animals, some believe that steps can be taken to control and even undo the damage. In my opinion, it is not too late as with the technology available we can correct the damage.
On the one hand, some people say that it is not too late as the technology to support humanitarian efforts to control the damage to many flora and fauna is available and I agree. In the modern era, with the help of technology, various heating monitors have been developed to keep a track of biodiversity. Also, people in the present age are more aware of the importance of plants and animals for human survival. In the recent survey of Asiatic lions and tigers, it has been discovered that their population has increased. It is believed that if efforts are put more endangered species can be protected. For instance, Africa has outlawed the deforestation which has prevented many endangered species.
On the other hand, some people believe that it is too late to begin as many flora and fauna species have already been extinct. We, as humans, have failed to learn and still desire for hunting and things, made from animal skins and bones. Thus, it is often claimed that any efforts to conserve them would end up in vain. Another reason is that it took hundreds of years to cause this damage and would require thousands of years of continuous efforts to control and reverse the pace. People believe they are not ready for such a mammoth task.
In conclusion, people opinion may vary, but results have been achieved in the past and with the technology, they can be achieved at a greater pace.

Votes
Average: 6.5 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun flora seems to be countable; consider using: 'many florae', 'many floras'.
Suggestion: many florae; many floras
...believe that it is too late to begin as many flora and fauna species have already been ext...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, thus, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1304.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59154929577 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39266716852 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510563380282 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7012529803 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.307692308 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204904209698 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712886329314 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632813644751 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130714629681 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379813778151 0.056905535591 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.