The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts?
A family get-together meal is very important in our tradition. However, that traditional habit is fading significantly due to many motives and it also leads to numerous adverse consequences.
There are two main factors why family members do not prefer having meals together than in the past. Firstly, due to different working environments that people have their own eating habits. In fact, under the pressure of money, people have to work far from home, work overtime or even night shift; therefore, hardly can they find time to come back home to have lunch or dinner with their parents or spouses. Moreover, to maintain outside relationships such as co-workers, customers or friends, having meals in restaurants is a far more popular choice. Secondly, thanks to the popularity of technological devices like TV, computer, mobile phone and the like that children have various activities to do while enjoying meals. Eating in front of the TV is more interesting than spending time with parents. Consequently, family meals are becoming a less favorable choice in their daily life.
This concerning problem would cause serious results to the family’s life and the development of kids as well. From the family’s life viewpoint, having fewer family meals will break the bond among members. Parents and children or siblings do not have enough time and opportunities to develop closed and emotional relationship. Moreover, children’s personality development is also influenced negatively. If their parents show a careless attitude towards family bonding, those patterns of behavior will be definitely copied to them. In terms of the next generation’s health, it is easier for them to become couch potatoes. Having stomach ache or obesity is also a result of the above bad habit.
In conclusion, the decline in numbers of family meals, which is caused by several mentioned reasons has resulted in many detrimental consequences. Modern parents should spend more time on cooking and having meals together in order to educate their kids into fully developed citizens.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | The Lazy Tiger | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | hammy | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | Anh Nguyen 2604 | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | nhathoa | 90 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | ngotrancamtu | 61 | view |
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 67
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The diagrams show the cross sections of two tunnels one joining France and Italy and the other joining two Japanese islands 74
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?What sort of punishment should parents and 67
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38226299694 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97251481835 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62996941896 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9315904696 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7777777778 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157084125922 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551558855751 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621899939181 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112522034777 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428639050231 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.