The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005.
Given is the line chart illustrating the expenditure on books in four countries including Germany, France, Italy and Austria from 1995 to 2005.
It is clear that the figure for all four countries was seen as the gradual increase. A notable fact is that although there was a little fluctuation, German was the country splashing out on books the most.
To embark on, standing at a high point in 1995 at 80%, this country continued a stable climb with slight acceleration until 1999 to 90%, and then it received a slight lull. Followed by a growth pattern that was more varied, the percentage of money spent on books in Germany experienced a slight recovery to nearly 100%. Meanwhile, the figure for the expenditure in France also gradually increased by 17% to 75% in ten year’s time.
Likewise, 50% consumer spending on books in 1995 in Italy and it was subject to overall volatility after four years. Finally, the percentage of expenditure on this category in Italy jumped further to 61% in 2005. At the same time, there was a mere minority of spending on this item in Austria in 1995, at 30%, however, the figure for Austria abruptly surge over 70% and was higher than in Italy.
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 78
- The bar graph below shows the number of television receivers per 1000 inhabitants in the world in 1970 and 1997 85
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their was 67
- The best way to increase employees' job satisfaction is to increase their salaries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000 It also predicts figures for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 62
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, likewise, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 987.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74519230769 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5770979777 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2259784217 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.666666667 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214105663964 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902243616976 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0941508706525 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147378357076 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112700905708 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.