life expectancy in medical care.
In the tech-savvy era, medical advancement has accelerated rapidly among common masses around the world as it is mushrooming the life expectancy for people. The substantial number of people believes that it is the greatest achievement in the medical field. However, others consider it negative enlargement for society and individuals. I will analyze both perspectives before lead to a plausible conclusion,
To commence with, it brings myriad benefits to mankind. First and foremost, the average age of death is increased from 46 to 59 approximately of individuals. Similarly, juveniles can spend quality time with their loved ones. Furthermore, medical care makes possible to cure every fatal malady. As a tangible example, a recent study conducted by the Economic Times reveals that 80% of ailments are treated with medication only. In addition, people can enjoy a healthy lifestyle than ever before.
On the contrary, every rose has a bush of thorns, so this trend has some pitfalls for both individual and environment. Most importantly, with medical expectancy, the old population is burgeoning drastically. Consequently, it can cause unemployment among the young generation. Secondly, it is a threat to the myriad resources on earth. Besides, it also creates a financial burden on families as the treatment and daily checkups are expensive extremely.
To cite an epitome, this phenomenon has a plethora of merits as people could enjoy healthy living. However, it has no dearth of demerits as well. I firmly concur that every individual should deal with demerits to eliminate it so that everyone takes advantage of medical care.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-29 | mohammadsabet | 77 | view |
| 2022-12-21 | Nina Tsarevich | 80 | view |
| 2022-09-28 | Yuli | view | |
| 2022-07-15 | Nawal Fatima | 72 | view |
| 2022-07-15 | Nawal Fatima | 77 | view |
- life expectancy 77
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. 72
- science or arts which is best? 80
- experience is superior to formal method of learning. 85
- music promotes learning. 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, well, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37354085603 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03409144747 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645914396887 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3382317299 50.4703680194 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.2352941176 104.977214359 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1176470588 20.9669160288 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22180018647 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511636552434 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785929427648 0.071462118173 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111024882985 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559202099882 0.0609392437508 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 12.6369458128 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 53.1260098522 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.27 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.