Venus
The listening lecture totally opposes to the reading passage in the possibility to maintain a permanent human presence pressure on Venus. First of all, the reading says that the atmospheric pressure at Venus' surface is at least 90 times greater than Earth surface, so any spacecraft that land of the surface will be crushed. However, the listening argues that people are actually planing to create floating spacecraft in the atmosphere. It will be 50km above the surface. As we know, the pressure in the atmosphere is lower than the pressure on the surface, so spacecraft getting crash will not be possible to happen anymore.
In addition, the reading suggests that there is no water and oxygen on Venus for people to survive. On the other hand, the listening asserts that even though there is no water and oxygen, researchers find out other method to solve this problem. There is a lot of carbon dioxide and other chemicals contain in Venus' atmosphere, and people can mix these chemicals together to obtain oxygen and water. In other words, if people can produce oxygen and water by themselves, the absence of water and oxygen in Venus will not cause any problem.
Last but not least, the reading implies that there is little sunlight that can reach to the planet's surface, so human could not get electricity for powering machines. However, the listening indicates that the clouds at the high place attitude are not very thick, so light can still reach to the surface. Besides, since the cloud can reflect the light, people can use solar power to absorb both the light from above and below. Therefore, these light can give human enough electricity to power the machines. To say it differently, this hypothesis is not likely to be true because clouds will not block all of the light and people can still receive enough sunlight when the clouds reflect the light.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Zmx_6 | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Zmx_6 | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | YasamanEsml | 65 | view |
| 2023-02-11 | reza_fattahi | 83 | view |
| 2023-02-11 | reza_fattahi | 76 | view |
- Extinction 73
- Agree or disagree. It is better to finish a project completely and then begin another project than to work on two or more projects at the same time. 66
- Sinosauroteryx 73
- providing food for the growing population around the world is more important than protecting the environment. 70
- TED 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 601, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...o be true because clouds will not block all of the light and people can still receive enou...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, first, however, if, so, still, therefore, at least, in addition, first of all, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 318.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87735849057 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43148468964 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487421383648 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.0 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1807777172 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.785714286 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148275152968 0.272083759551 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636942288862 0.0996497079465 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878322461354 0.0662205650399 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105938570924 0.162205337803 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078835162376 0.0443174109184 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.