Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon On the other hand conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible First atmospheric pre

In the reading passage, the author proposes several evidence to illustrate Venus is inhospitable for human to live. However, the speaker in the lecture disagrees with those opinions and believes that Venus is suitable to habitat by constructing a floating station.

First of all, the author of the passage claims that atmospheric pressure at Venus's surface is so high that spacecraft and human could be crushed when landing on it. However, the lecturer deems this problem can be address with a station which is floating 50 kilometers above the surface, as atmospheric pressure decreases as the altitude increases. At this level, the pressure is similar to that of on the earth, which poses no danger to human.

Secondly, the passage says that the lack of water and oxygen in Venus's atmosphere require human transport resources from earth, defeating the purpose of building a permanent station. However, the lecturer counters this argument by emphasizing that chemical compounds could be used to process as water and oxygen in the station. Chemical substances, such as carbon dioxide, obtained in the atmosphere is able to be utilized to produce necessary resources, thus, there is no need to import water and oxygen from earth.

Finally, opposing to the author's third point that little sunlight can be used to power machines as light is blocked and reflected, the speaker contends that clouds is not that thick at the 50 kilometers above the surface. Moreover, the floating station can also use the sunlight reflected both above and below the clouds. Therefore, adequate light can be generated to power the machines and equipment in the station.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[8]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun evidence seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'some evidence'.
Suggestion: some evidence
...he reading passage, the author proposes several evidence to illustrate Venus is inhospitable for...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thus, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 268.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1828358209 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6657229316 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522388059701 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2603105071 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.272727273 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.81818181818 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153204297214 0.272083759551 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061945545497 0.0996497079465 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370269366852 0.0662205650399 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0929829379784 0.162205337803 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333980024857 0.0443174109184 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.