The improvements in medical assistance have a perceptible effect on society worldwide. Nowadays, people are living not only longer and healthier life, but also their life span average is rising up steadily. Although there are advantages of this progress, I personally think that the drawbacks far outpaced the benefits because it is a double-edged sword for the community in the long-term.
The only noticeable advantage of living longer is that people can stay even longer with their beloved, which, in turn, means that their knowledge and wisdom are inherited by their younger generation. Elders are an infinite source of information and experience which can help others to face many challenges of life. For instance, kids and adolescents can, empowered with that privileged knowledge, easily avoid the sweet temptation of drugs and others harmful additions.
On the contrary, there are two main drawbacks of having a sustained growth of longevity. Firstly, the number of humans on earth inevitably will rise. Under this scenario basic resources, particularly food, would be in high demand. This could provoke a shortage of food at global scale, badly affecting developing countries. Moreover, if people live far beyond the retirement age, they will not contribute to the economy at all, but they will still need to use the public services ( transportation, welfare, etc.). As a direct consequence, public administrations would irremediably have to raise taxes as a quick way to face that unexpected cost. For example, in Spain, due to its overwhelming number of retires, is the country with the highest taxation levels in Europe.
To conclude, although it obvious that elderly people can contribute immensely with their expertise, it cannot be ignored that society might witness a food shortfall and an unexpected tax increase.
- influence of human beings on the world's ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio diversity.what are the primary causes of loss of bio - diversity ?what solutions can you suggest 11
- Some people think it’s better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them. Other people believe it’s good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organizations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
- Some people think certain prisoners should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind bars. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- You will move to a new city for work. You know some people who live there.Write a letter to someone you know live there. In your letter » Ask them for help finding accommodation » Tell them where you would like to live » Tell them the type of pla 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 472, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'services'' or 'service's'?
Suggestion: services'; service's
... they will still need to use the public services transportation, welfare, etc.. As a di...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 480, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll still need to use the public services transportation, welfare, etc.. As a dire...
^^
Line 5, column 510, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...c services transportation, welfare, etc.. As a direct consequence, public adminis...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, still, for example, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38541666667 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92518390988 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638888888889 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1975256682 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.785714286 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165157853407 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481959880545 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502356936148 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977849565202 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730123065462 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.