Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
The upsurge of large innovative companies results in their international branches in most countries around the world. Therefore, citizens can shop for the same popular goods in their own countries, even developing ones. This phenomenon has brought both motives and drawbacks to both citizens and manufacturers.
On the one hand, the fact that people can buy the same products everywhere has helped improved society remarkably. Firstly, it creates harmony among countries, which assists greatly in the integration of immigrants into new cultures. Since the industry and the way people dress is almost the same, newcomers will find it familiar and easier for them to settle down and become citizens in new environments. Secondly, because the same products are equipped similarly, the discrimination rate also decreased significantly. For example, workers from Indonesia or Malaysia will feel less pressure when working in a multi-national company in Singapore since there is no difference in their clothes, accessories and other equipment as well. As a result, citizens, especially who come from undeveloped and ethnic regions will benefit greatly from the current trend.
On the other hand, various negative impacts also arise from similar products consumed by people worldwide. The first detrimental consequence is that the trend will cause great damage to the national products of a country. In fact, people tend to use big international brands because they are affordable and common as well. Consequently, industries and retailers are forced to close due to the lack of customers. Moreover, the special feature of a culture, which is costumes and traditional clothes, is also affected tremendously since people do not have the need to wear them frequently. Therefore, the image of a tradition will soon be faded.
From all the above-given, the trend that nations are becoming similar because of the availability of products in almost every country contribute positively to human’s lives; however, it also causes several damages to domestic aspects. A government should control the flow of international products to the country strictly in order to preserve its national values.
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both views and giv 73
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee 59
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age group in the USA between 1850 and 2000. 67
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, well, for example, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1859.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51632047478 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00248937682 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605341246291 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2638554367 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.352941176 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8235294118 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76470588235 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205800783365 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577452931717 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491241682745 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116789456841 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207783701523 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.