Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes.

Essay topics:

Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes.

Recently, worldwide travel destinations have welcomed a vast number of visitors yearly. However, local people find it displeasing. Although there are many causes for this issue, the measures could be implement to reduce them.

The bad attitudes can rise from numerous ways. One of the first grounds of this is that the negative behavior from tourists annoys the native residents daily. The rubbish is thrown away into unwanted place such as the lakes, streets, or gardens with a serious number. The inhabitants may be the people who clean all the dirt to protect their environment. If they do not take that job, the area might be polluted in the air, water, or even noise which is produced by people came in as guests. Another major concern is the entering of disease. When a tourist has a visit in another country without noticing their disease, it may expand to the whole area. If governments could not find it and localize quickly, the disease might spread out and break out as pandemic to the country.

It is crucial that action is taken to manage these undesirable results. First, governments should apply the law of protecting environment to visitors. For example, Singapore forces the tourists to pay money because they drop even a tiny litter on the street which is caught by cameras. The fee that they have to return is not law at all. Second, medical check could also help the government to control the disease. Before entering a country, people could show their medical report from doctors, or have a check-up at the airport.

To conclude, negative feelings about global tourism still are popular in society. However, this can be solved by plenty of methods.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-02-16 Tinh Cao Van 61 view
2019-02-16 Tinh Cao Van 56 view
2019-02-16 Tinh Cao Van 61 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task II - IELTS Academic
Essays by user Tinh Cao Van :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, second, so, still, for example, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91901408451 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47962086597 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62676056338 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7017492047 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.5263157895 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9473684211 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.68421052632 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132903316665 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0337108926689 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347935079867 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0751110681093 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.012064534741 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.0946893788 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.66 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.