Social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter are observed to have more negative effects than positive being more useful for the criminals than others.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience
Social Networking, right from the days of Orkut, Hi-5 to Facebook and twitter, have always been pictured as a facilitating means to find long lost friendships, love and to connect with relatives, who, otherwise would fade away from our lives, without a moment’s though. Off late, however, social media is being viewed as a bane rather than a boon, which it was initially perceived as.
In this context, it would be very easy to say, that these have become a den for criminals and their handiworks, however, this cannot be proved in its entirety. For anything, there are always two sides: positive and negative. Social media sites, have been connecting with people that easier, also, the level of exposure, even till hand of a daily wage labourer has become so vivid, that people think twice before making a mistake (particularly people in power), it serves a business platform for budding entrepreneurs, it serves as a platform for creating awareness, for requesting for help from the society, in case of emergencies (Keto, Milaap and other such apps basically use Facebook as a platform to raise funding for various campaigns to help people out).
However, as said earlier, everything has two sides to it and social networking cannot be portrayed as saintly, which are purely used for the above mentioned purposes. There are elements, who spread rumours and false information, which has resulted in the death of many, there are instances of fraud, adultery, hate mongering, racism, caste propagation and so on and so forth. Apart from these, there is also a fair amount psychological attributes, which are attached to social networking sites, such as, depression, loss of emotions, fatigue, addiction to being socially active, zero privacy etc.
The need to scrap or change anything arises, when the cons outweigh the positives and though the negatives are many and flashing, the major pros of the networking sites outweigh the negatives, which can be overcome by tightening the security protocols and by educating the user base.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-02 | RAndrewRubesh | 89 | view |
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes, the government has to pay for this care.Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?G 67
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.To what extent do you agree with this view? 73
- The increase in mobile phones use in recent years has transformed the way we live, communicate and do business. Mobile phones can also be the cause of social or medical problems. What forms do these problems take?Do you think advantages outweigh the disad 56
- Social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter are observed to have more negative effects than positive being more useful for the criminals than others.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and incl 89
- You live in a room in college which you share with another student. However, there are many problems with this arrangement and you find it difficult to work.Write a letter to the accommodation officer at the college. In the letter,a) describe the situatio 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 516, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ness platform for budding entrepreneurs, it serves as a platform for creating awa...
^^
Line 3, column 596, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...being socially active, zero privacy etc. The need to scrap or change anything ari...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, apart from, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11711711712 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72245369041 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618618618619 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.2975951904 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 127.810720391 49.4020404114 259% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 189.333333333 106.682146367 177% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.0 20.7667163134 178% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239920514679 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902532862766 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411601590565 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121614311351 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467867714714 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.2 13.0946893788 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.92 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 11.3001002004 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.1190380762 166% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.