Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Teachers have a great impact in the students’ life. Students can be easily affected by the teachers’ point of view, as some of them may consider the teacher as a role model. That is why teachers should carefully speak and act in front of the students. Some people think that only parents can control the behavior of their kids. However, I believe that teachers equally participate with parents in students’ personal lives. That is because students stay most of the day with teachers and friends in schools or colleges and students do respect and appreciate each word the teacher says.
Students’ day is divided between school and home. School and homework take almost most of the day, so parents eventually don’t see their kids unless after school or at dinner time. This should confirm that schools have the most impact in students’ behaviors. If teachers clearly revealed their social or political views, their will be arguments and conflicts between students about who has the write opinion or who is better than whom. Children take teachers as a role model, so they try to imitate their behavior. Eventually, this may affect students’ behavior aganist specific ethnicity or a different politically point of view. Teachers should learn students how to respect and accept each other with our differences.
Students do respect the teachers’ opinion even they were against this point of view a time ago. As a matter of fact, when I was at high school, I loved my science teacher and considered him as a role model in my future. One day he talked about his political view in some issues happened at that period of time. I was so convinced that he had the write opinion. When I arrived home, I spoke with my parents aggressively because they were against my teacher’s point of view. My parents knew instantly how did the teacher’s discussion with me greatly impact my judgement. My father calmly sat with me and corrected some mistakes I have done. However, if my science teacher had never spoken about his political view, I would never build my assumptions based on his. From this specific example, it is easy to see that teachers do affect students in a positive or negative way.
In conclusion, the school is the place where students learn how to respect and care about each other and their community. Teachers shouldn’t waste their time talking about their social or political point of views that may create problems among students and impact their future.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-27 Shiimaaa 76 view
2020-01-23 supergirl20 60 view
2020-01-12 naziii 70 view
2020-01-01 sahar yarahmadi 70 view
2019-12-14 shrijan 73 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user hepa :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 405, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...onflicts between students about who has the write opinion or who is better than whom. Chi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...al view in some issues happened at that period of time. I was so convinced that he had the wri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...of time. I was so convinced that he had the write opinion. When I arrived home, I spoke w...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, in conclusion, talking about, as a matter of fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2100.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01193317422 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78462301699 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477326968974 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 633.6 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3364321476 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4583333333 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.95833333333 5.45110844103 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236935729293 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082806175853 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476406359601 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174518804801 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225373334255 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.