We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.
Learning is a continuous process and has no bounds in terms of its sources. The people to whom we share our views can help us to gain our knowledge and enhance our learning. The people whose views contradict from our views can help us in identifying and rectifying our concepts and hence again enhancing the knowledge. So we can learn not only from people whose views we share but also from people whose views contradict our own.
Learning is a cumulative process and with healthy discussion with people we can understand the things in a better way. If a person do only self learning, he can think only in one aspect. Discussion of his learning with the person to whom he share will provides him different aspects of learning on the same issue. Along with that if he argues with the person having contradictory views, it will help him to know all positive and negative aspects and he can make improvements in his learning according to that.
For an example in an debate both in favor and in against candidates present their views on an certain issue. A person sitting in the audience should listen both the aspects on the issue and after listening he can make his own opinion including all if and pros on that particular issue. Thus he can learn from both type of people.
While discussing from a person whose views are contradicting from us, we should be careful in learning because it is also possible they can provide us false information which will certainly degrade our knowledge and learning. So we should be very cautious while learning from these people and should learn only good things from them.
Thus for learning we cannot bound the sources of information, instead of that we should include both type of person i.e. from whom we share the views and from people whose views contradict our own. It will help us in better learning and we can gain and improve a lot.
- Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another. 51
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 67
- The council of Maple Country, concerned about the county's becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limiting 62
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station. "Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the 87
- The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens. 62
Sentence: A person sitting in the audience should listen both the aspects on the issue and after listening he can make his own opinion including all if and pros on that particular issue.
Description: The tag a conjunction, subordinating is not usually followed by and
Suggestion: Refer to if and and
Sentence: Thus for learning we cannot bound the sources of information, instead of that we should include both type of person i.e. from whom we share the views and from people whose views contradict our own.
Description: The word bound is not usually used as a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to bound
Sentence: The people whose views contradict from our views can help us in identifying and rectifying our concepts and hence again enhancing the knowledge.
Error: rectifying Suggestion: No alternate word
flaws:
No. of Different Words: 140 200
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 333 350
No. of Characters: 1520 1500
No. of Different Words: 140 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.272 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.565 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.437 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 98 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 68 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 46 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 27 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.2 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.093 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.432 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.656 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.387 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5