Essay topics: As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion?
One of the conspicuous trends in today's world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that government should build roads for population. There are widespread reasons that can make this statement true. In my opinion, government should work on building roads instead of creating better networks of public transport. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view with relevant examples.
To commence with, there are myriad of reasons why I am in favour of the aforementioned statement. Foremost among these, I accord that population is growing these days, so there is a need to build new roads for people. For instance, in some countries population is increasing day by day, so there is a need to build new roads for growing population. Therefore, government should work on building more roads for vehicle owning population.
On the other hand, some people think that government should work on creating better networks of public transportation than building more roads. From a personal perspective, people have no enough time in a busy schedule to travel long distances. Long distance makes people lazy or tired to travel other places. They do not go for picnic with family due to long distances. For examples, few villages are still suffering from this situation. They are not able to travel long distances due to less roads. Hence, government should focus on building new roads for people so anyone can easily travel.
In conclusion, government should work on building roads instead of creating better networks of public transportation because it can make travel easy for growing population.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-12 | Yuli | 77 | view |
| 2023-01-12 | Yuli | 77 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | fereshteh.r | 85 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | fereshteh.r | 55 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | fereshteh.r | 88 | view |
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with personal examples. 55
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with personal examples. 88
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with personal examples. 55
- Essay topics: As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? 70
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss. 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...roads for people. For instance, in some countries population is increasing day by day, so...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 490, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun roads is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ot able to travel long distances due to less roads. Hence, government should focus o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 8.36945812808 12% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 5.75862068966 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15209125475 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78440729739 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 139.433497537 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501901140684 0.580463131201 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 403.2 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.5450340136 50.4703680194 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6875 104.977214359 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4375 20.9669160288 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.25397266985 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395521602368 0.242375264174 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140102361079 0.0925447433944 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132810196502 0.071462118173 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268111520657 0.151781067708 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289195754977 0.0609392437508 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 12.6369458128 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.1260098522 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.9458128079 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.32886699507 89% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 55.0591133005 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.