A company is going to give some money either to support the arts or to protect the environment. Which do you think the company should choose? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Successful companies who decide to support issues that do not have a direct impact on them are perceived better by society. Every type of donation is very helpful in improving the community; however, I believe that the best contribution would be by donating to environment purposes. This is for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, environmental conditions are in the highest point of degradation in the history. All these scientific and technological innovations have exponentially increased the productivity of work; however, at the same time, they have destroyed nature in an unprecedented fashion. As a result, any kind of help from big corporations towards this huge problem would be extremely valuable for people in the long-run. My own experience is a compelling example of how corporation can improve the place we live. I live in small city called Prishtina. About ten years ago, there used to be a river that flowed in the middle of the city; it was very beautiful for a long time nonetheless it did not last long. People started to throw all kinds of garbage in it; as a result, the smell made it impossible to live or walk near it. Nonetheless, a big corporation decided to do a huge favor to our community and covered it with soil. As a result, this firm made a huge improvement in our life.
Secondly, helping the environment is a very common marketing strategy. Nature destruction is by far the most debated and covered issue in the media. Therefore, when a firm funds something related to improving natural conditions, every title of every medium has the firm’s name on it. As a result, by supporting a cause that affects a lot of people, their advertisement is very successful for a lower cost. For example, a company from my country called Golden Eagle two years ago declared that for every can of energy drink they would sell, ten percent would go to a foundation established for the purpose of cleaning national parks. As a consequence, every media outlet was talking about their action; in addition, their profits, even after deducing ten percent that was meant to go to their fund, grew astronomically. This is a good example on how companies can help the community and themselves by supporting environmental issues.
In conclusion, I acknowledge the fact that some people might think supporting artists is a better way for firms to spend their money. Nonetheless, I believe that helping environment is a better choice. This is because our nature is in very bad conditions and needs help; also, because it is a win-win situation for companies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-03 | hasan123456 | 80 | view |
- A company is going to give some money either to support the arts or to protect the environment. Which do you think the company should choose? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- In some countries teenagers have jobs while they are still students Do you think this is a good idea Support your opinion by using specific reasons and details 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Overall the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today s world Use reasons and details to support your opinion 95
- People listen to music for different reasons and at different times. Why is music important to many people? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice 70
- Imagine that you are preparing for a trip. You plan to be away from your home for a year. In addition to clothing and personal care items, you can take one additional thing. What would you take and why? Use specific reasons and details to support your cho 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an unprecedented fashion" with adverb for "unprecedented"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e same time, they have destroyed nature in an unprecedented fashion. As a result, any kind of help from big...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, talking about, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 22.412803532 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 30.3222958057 181% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.01324503311 319% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2175.0 1373.03311258 158% => OK
No of words: 442.0 270.72406181 163% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92081447964 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.04702891845 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96646714379 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 145.348785872 164% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5407239819 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 419.366225166 168% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 3.25607064018 399% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 1.25165562914 559% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 13.0662251656 168% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5325920869 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8636363636 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.31818181818 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 4.33554083885 346% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122305650231 0.272083759551 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0357642577467 0.0996497079465 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547295248387 0.0662205650399 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0808208070156 0.162205337803 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033480906898 0.0443174109184 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 63.6247240618 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.