Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Of those issues that many societies have concerned since antiquity, setting up the rules and regulations is one of the most prominent. In this respect, some people believe that today’s rules are too strict for youngsters to obey. However, some others stand at the other extreme, holding the view that contemporary regulations are not rigid but beneficial. Yet to the best of my knowledge, I side with the latter idea. In the following paragraphs, I lend credence to my standpoint.
First and foremost, the judicial system has passed legislation to regulate the youth in upright conduct. Suffice to say, rules apply to bring into line the young people whose behavior goes beyond allowed by principles of a community. In this regard, some laws would be somehow tough to meet the requirements of norms and framework; the absence of which will lead to anarchic, chaotic society. An example can drive this notion home. In my country, drinking alcohol is illegal, cultivating young people to become detached from its adverse effect on their body not only physically but also mentally. That is not to say that they cannot have joyful time, but these juveniles can consume their energy in a more moral, positive way such as going to the party and dancing without dinking prohibitive beverage. Had the government not set regulations against the alcohol, young people in my country would not be able to be prosperous in the first flush of their youth.
What is more, today’s rules and regulations are based on collective wisdom, contributing to rational, practical restriction to the youth. To elucidate more on this issue, contemporary laws are supposed to carry out comprehensively and thoroughly, for they would not be accomplished if rules were too rigid and solid. It is crystal clear that young people are on the threshold of adulthood, walking through the door to their future. In this regard, under no circumstances are the young people to be left lawless, leading to hazardous, aggressive behaviors such as juvenile delinquency. For instance, one of the most overriding rules regulated is about the speed limit. This measure is to protect youngsters against perilous, precarious situations. Therefore, laws prove to be not only worthwhile but also crucial for protecting young people.
In the final analysis, I have to reiterate my standpoint that today’s laws are not too rigid for the youth to obey. This is because young people are taught to respect norms and beliefs; and rules are regulated by the conversant, erudite judicial system, which considers all the merits and demerits of the law.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- If people want to contribute to the society, which of the following is the best way?1. Riding bicycle or walking on foot2. Recycling the waste3. Buy local organic food 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: "A person should never make an important decision alone." 88
- Opening a new place such as shopping malls, food courts, or recreational areas brings several changes to the community. These businesses can be an underlying cause of the prosperity for any given society. Inaugurating a new restaurant in my neighborhood w 88
- Some people think the media (including newspaper, televisions, radio, and internet sources) are less concerned with the accuracy of news. Some people think the information from the media are becoming incorrect. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion o 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, such as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2190.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12880562061 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84339804433 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548009367681 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 685.8 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8713332092 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.285714286 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.19047619048 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160677534309 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488520322985 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438599208475 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108685223879 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340992581418 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.