nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. why do you think people waste food? what can be done to reduce the amount of food that throw away.
Today by industrializing societies as well as augmenting population, global demand for varieties of foods has increased, eventually causing more of them go to waste. Although there are some unfathomable reasons for squandering food commodities, not only can this problem, wasting food, be tackled, but also there are some utilitarian ways to cut it down and prevent people from doing this costly deed. Both aspects will discuss.
Some people deliberately and wittingly waste food while others do not. First and foremost reason for squandering food originated from competing against each other. For instance, holding a wedding ceremony, it would lose a sizable amount of food. Root cause of this losing is owing to inviting distant relatives and generally persons out of circle of friends and acquaintances. It speaks volumes which most of them would not come to the ceremony. Second set of people are those inviting just first circle of friends and family, but invited person do not take part in ceremony without declaring host in advance. It is crystal clear that the former group consciously while the latter one ignorantly waste food. Second reason is for people not paying attention to requisites of their family and buying food commodity more than their family’s need, leading to go off more of them, then, they should throw away.
To preclude and coerce people not to throw away food there are some applicable and useful methods. The first and the most efficacious way could be done by government via imposing severe tax on food. High tax causes the wasting food to decreased as soon as applying. Moreover, having been given chip to people by government, they buy food just as to their needs. This way affords the complement way to face with this phenomena, wasting food.
To recap briefly, some person lost food for competing with others, and some other people throws away only because of buying more than their needs. I am firmly think that the only by growing tax on food can this phenomenon be obviated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-10 | kaka singh | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-24 | Hafween | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | akva | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | okaycanada1 | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-12 | manas | 84 | view |
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn 78
- Should Government spend money on art when they have so many other important issues? 61
- The graph below shows the number of hours per day on average that children spent watching television 85
- The table below shows the expenditures of four car companies on advertising in the UK in 2002 84
- In the future it is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people in some countries Is this a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 899, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o go off more of them, then, they should throw away. To preclude and coerce pe...
^^
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...affords the complement way to face with this phenomena, wasting food. To recap br...
^^^^
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'thought'.
Suggestion: thought
...ying more than their needs. I am firmly think that the only by growing tax on food ca...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, moreover, second, so, then, well, while, as to, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04166666667 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58659548257 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580357142857 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3792783806 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1111111111 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377220414911 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125874548842 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791079598768 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252042334128 0.151304729494 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414313027357 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.