The ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, traffic congestion and pollution on the roads are increasing day by day. one of the reasons for this is having more cars in a family. Some people argue that every family should be restricted with one car only to solve the problem of traffic and pollution. I completely agree with this argument and this essay will explain the key points in favour of this agreement.
Firstly, due to increase in buying capacity, many families can afford more than one car, therefore, in spite of need, people are buying second car to show their financial status. such people don't think the effects of such decision, more cars on road definitely leads to high congestion and pollution which they should understand. Everyone has a social responsibility towards society and environment and people should fulfill that responsibility and should not deteriorate the environment just for the sake of showing false status.
Secondly, today all the family members are busy in their own routines and they rarely get time to talk to each other. Even they go to their work places in their own car irrespective of closeness of work places among each other. Thus, restricting one car per family will give them a chance to go together and will give them an opportunity to talk to each other during the travel period. this will increase the harmony among the family members which eventually will result into a happy society and reduced pollution and traffic jams.
To conclude, restriction of one car per family is a good idea as it will help in reducing the pollution, traffic jams and increasing the happiness of society. I believe that governments will consider this suggestion seriously and will try to implement it in future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-03 | vijaymehta31 | 80 | view |
| 2019-01-10 | ddk0014 | 77 | view |
| 2018-10-04 | Hari Sharma | 77 | view |
| 2018-06-19 | hoandang | 85 | view |
| 2018-06-12 | Kushi | 77 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...on the roads are increasing day by day. one of the reasons for this is having more ...
^^^
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Such
...ond car to show their financial status. such people dont think the effects of such d...
^^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...how their financial status. such people dont think the effects of such decision, mor...
^^^^
Line 5, column 387, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...to each other during the travel period. this will increase the harmony among the fam...
^^^^
Line 7, column 256, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... seriously and will try to implement it in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95501730104 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63098223179 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546712802768 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 448.2 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2773072141 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.153846154 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07692307692 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261350561807 0.242375264174 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977048423291 0.0925447433944 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903500825773 0.071462118173 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164116874504 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466608377445 0.0609392437508 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.