The line graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The figure elucidates the average number of Carbon-dioxide (CO2) emissions per individual in four European nations from 1967 to 2007. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable alterations occurred for the CO2 emissions of Sweden in comparison with other states and it is measured in metric tonnes.
To begin with, there was dramatic progress in the amount of CO2 emissions for Portugal in between 1967, which made up at just below four-seconds, and 2007, which constituted at well above sixteen-fourths. Following the same pattern as Portugal, 1967 to 1997 witnessed a tremendous growth for the value of CO2 uses in Italy, nevertheless, it remained stable in the next 10 years.
In accordance with the other countries, the number of CO2 emissions in the UK plunged remarkably over the entire period in which it, initially, stood at well under 12 and achieved at just over eighty-tenths in 2007. In contrast, Sweden experienced a different pattern rather than others. At first, it uplifted highly, soaring to just across 10 in 1977, afterwards, it, erratically, plummeted enormously to less than 6 by the end of the period shown.
- Some people think that it is good for a country's culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes. Others think that it is better to produce these locally. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- The two maps illustrate changes that have taken place in an area from 1995 to the present 72
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of the honey bee. 78
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. 78
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, second, so, well, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10106382979 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02679205137 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617021276596 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9784528912 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.0 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223789025295 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102716578891 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937787508212 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159884553768 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0818991223786 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.