The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011
The bar chart shows the rate of two types of accommodation in two particular countries from 1918 to 2011.
It can be seen easily seen that the proportions of households in owned accommodation showed an upward trend while the proportions of households renting showed a downward trend.
According to the given data, from 1918 to 1971, the difference between the two households slightly decreased. In 1918, the households owning had the lowest rate, about 22% and reached 41% in 1961. while the highest percentage was the households for rented, with about 78%, but tended to decline. After 13 years, both of the households types were equal at 50%.
From 1971, the proportions of household renting dipped from 50% to approximately 35% in 2011. this downward trend shifted this type from the highest rate becoming the lowest rate. that of the household in owned soared, nearly 70% in 2001 and finally ended up at 63% in 2011.
- The Internet will never replace traditional course books in schools How far do you agree with this prediction 54
- The graph below shows the percentage change in the number of international students graduating from universities in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006. 89
- In some countries, children are expected to study more time both in and after school. Advantages and disadvantages of this trend. 78
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals during festival periods people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- The pie chart below shows where energy is used in a typical Australian household, and the table shows the amount of electricity used according to the number of occupants. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make com 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...ate, about 22% and reached 41% in 1961. while the highest percentage was the househol...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 95, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... from 50% to approximately 35% in 2011. this downward trend shifted this type from t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
... highest rate becoming the lowest rate. that of the household in owned soared, nearl...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 774.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96153846154 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68175587921 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570512820513 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3484809374 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325889149337 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125327049019 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684125357826 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194431094094 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338004587233 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.