Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.
Nowadays, the question who is responsible for avoiding over packaging? has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the world. it is a widely held view that packaging is highly beneficial, while i tend to believe that one must weigh up the pros and cons of it.
From a social point of view, over packaging is indeed bound to damaging the environments, which it might lead to both additional costs for costumers and governments. For instance, a group of profound environmentalists, working at a prestigious university, conducted a longitudinal study of relationship between avoiding over packaging and saving the nature as well as a routine task for public. This evidence presents thus far supports the contention that avoiding additional packaging is correlated with not only producers responsibilities but also legislatures.
Moreover, in industrial terms, over packaging is undoubtedly attributable to using more materials and spending more money, in that it would lead to more expensive products. A well-known example of such attribution is using plastics, which is cause for consider since it had been mistaken in taking nature preservation for granted. Had cut the using plastics in advance, it might have had a opportunity to make the products cheaper. Thus, producers could play a significant role in avoiding over packaging.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that avoiding over packaging must be taken into consideration for producers. However, as many garden may have some weeds, The local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-05 | gobindh Singh | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Mahdi_Farhani | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-26 | lovepreetdhillon | 85 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | edsonsimoes | 55 | view |
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education compared to books? Agree or disagree 88
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss pros and cons impacts. 11
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. 88
- The consumption of sugary drinks has increased worldwide during the last few decades and is convincingly associated with the risk of obesity, which in turn is recognized as a strong risk factor for many cancers. But research on sugary drinks and the risk 77
- Many people prefer to spend money and not save it. What are the reasons? Is this a positive or negative development? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Has
...esponsible for avoiding over packaging? has become a long-running dispute among the...
^^^
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...for avoiding over packaging? has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... among the public all around the world. it is a widely held view that packaging is...
^^
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...t packaging is highly beneficial, while i tend to believe that one must weigh up ...
^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... plastics in advance, it might have had a opportunity to make the products cheape...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1385.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45275590551 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27735273995 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633858267717 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.155059155 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.416666667 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230895860659 0.242375264174 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087317268755 0.0925447433944 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677001450607 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133231517664 0.151781067708 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403286042089 0.0609392437508 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.