The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billion) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
The chart illustrates the proportion of time spent by UK residents on various types of telephone calls from 1995 to 2002.
According to the given data, local fixed line calls had the highest number throughout the period, from 72 billion minutes in 1995 to 87 billion minutes in 1999. but in the following year, this figure dipped and ended up at 1995 number.
National and international fixed line calls showed an upward trend, from under 40 billion minutes in 1995 to 45 billion in 1999, and finally peaked at 55 billion minutes in 2002.
At the same time, mobiles was the the least minute calls in 3 types, only under 10 billion minutes, but increased during the following years. this figure finally soared at 46 billion minutes, tripled the figure in 1995.
To conclusion, although local fixed line calls were still the most popular in 2002, other types of calls had increased considerably through the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Nguyễn Thành Vinh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | aghasaeed | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | rahulsd | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | morbymuku | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | Saeed Najd Ataei | 78 | view |
- The pie chart below shows where energy is used in a typical Australian household, and the table shows the amount of electricity used according to the number of occupants. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make com 84
- The Internet will never replace traditional course books in schools How far do you agree with this prediction 54
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals during festival periods people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billion) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 73
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
... in 1995 to 87 billion minutes in 1999. but in the following year, this figure dipp...
^^^
Line 7, column 31, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... 2002. At the same time, mobiles was the the least minute calls in 3 types, only und...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 31, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... 2002. At the same time, mobiles was the the least minute calls in 3 types, only und...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...t increased during the following years. this figure finally soared at 46 billion min...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 769.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92948717949 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39434017874 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570512820513 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3838336772 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.857142857 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352415472551 0.215688989381 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166355822969 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0949861815523 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204766118328 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0870474936885 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.