The tendency of human beings to copy one another is shown in the popularity of fashion clothes and consumer goods. To what extent do you agree?
Copying is genetically imbibed into every living organism, be it a bacterium, a mouse or an elephant. By copying, they may achieve a better environment for living, abundant in food and safety, which is after all a must for survival. Humans have also received copying as a genetic trait from their ancestors, which shows in the way they dress, speak or use material objects.
To begin with, fashion trends speak of this makeup of human minds, which become popular all over the world in a few days after first coming into light. Celebrities are the ones who are followed the most in this regard. Brand names also trend among people, who can prefer one brand over another and as such cause some brand following in a certain community. It can be seen in the case of Indian residents in the UK who do follow a local brand despite of there being some cheaper or a better line of clothing.
Additionally, with things other than clothing, we see a following in case of electronic goods and other household items by the masses in the name of current trends. It is evident in the increased demand of flat screen television sets and led tv screens, that all the individuals do want to stay on top of the fashion triangle. Other goods of household and daily use also follow a similar path. Mobile hand sets tend to come from a certain manufacturer or another, according to the taste of the person using it and, in mix-cultured society, ethnicity also decides the model that people use.
Conclusively, it can be said that copying is a trait that has been in nature from a long time, has passed down to the successors genetically or culturally, and will continue to be a force of great strength which will keep on driving the coming generation in many good, and sometimes bad ways.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-06 | Faramarz Abbasi | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-04 | Panesar | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-04 | Panesar | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-03 | SonaliShah | 11 | view |
| 2019-01-03 | abc@11 | 61 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, may, so, after all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64761904762 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5581471627 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590476190476 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.3766188346 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129345301454 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445427634128 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334868469066 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0711521815062 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034730928495 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.