The tendency of human beings to copy one another is shown in the popularity of fashion clothes and consumer goods. To what extent do you agree?
Copying is genetically imbibed into every living organism, be it a bacterium, a mouse or an elephant. By copying, they may achieve a better environment for living which is abundant in food and safety, which is after all, a must for survival. Humans have also received copying as a genetic trait from their ancestors, which shows in the way they dress, speak or use material objects.
Firstly, fashion trends are an example of this makeup of human minds, which become popular all over the world in a few days after first coming into light. Celebrities are the ones who are followed the most in this regard as people tend to follow their idols. Secondly, brand names also trend among people, who prefer one brand over another and as such, cause some brand following in a certain community. It can be seen in the case of Indian residents in the UK who do follow a local brand despite of there being some cheaper or a better line of clothing as people feel obliged to follow the crowd.
Additionally, we see a fan-following in the case of electronic goods and other household items too by the masses in the name of current trends. It is evident in the increased demand of flat screen television sets, LED TV screens, and other such gadgets, that all the individuals want to own to stay on top of the fashion triangle. Other goods of household and daily use also follow a similar path. Mobile hand sets have to come from a certain manufacturer or another, according to the taste of the person using it. In a neighborhood with a mixed culture population, ethnicity also decides the mobile phone model that is being used.
Such trends are a global occurrence, and while falling for these, some individuals go way beyond their financial limits to acquire them. This leads to a bad financial plan for their future. Hence, a religious fashion following must be prevented.
To conclude, it can be said that copying is a trait that has been in nature from a long time, has passed down to the successors genetically or culturally, and will continue to be a force of great strength which will keep on driving the coming generation in many good, and sometimes bad ways.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-06 | Faramarz Abbasi | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-04 | Panesar | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-04 | Panesar | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-03 | SonaliShah | 11 | view |
| 2019-01-03 | abc@11 | 61 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, may, second, secondly, so, after all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63551401869 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55479445345 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573208722741 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.6891128008 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119295349675 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406670185792 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332996163824 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0655740801809 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037191499006 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.