Art subjects, such as painting, drawing, music, play a pivotal role in primary and secondary school since these courses offer certain benefit to pupils’ overall development. However, I believe that making art subjects compulsory provides high school students with nothing but drawbacks
Art education would be far too success without considering students’ interests and characters. Art subjects, such as painting, or drawing, are tailored to improve learners’ imagination and creativity. However, compulsory courses mean uniform norms, required assignments, and standard exams. In this situation, forced study would not be unusual, which might create undue pressure on students or even end up with weariness in study, particularly when an individual shows no interest in the course. Also, the knowledge and skills teenagers acquired from art courses previously, for example, in secondary school, could well meet the basic requirement in daily life. Without further demand or extra desire, what children get from compulsory courses is only a waste of time and effort, which should’ve been used more worthwhile, for example, to improve professional performance.
High school students not are only capable enough but also have the right to select courses themselves based on interest and planned career. During high school, teenagers have already been rather familiar with every subject. Based on this, they are capable to figure out what they like or talent in. Also, teenagers in this period are standing on a crucial intersection of life. To go college for further study, or to apply for a job, will decide their future direction. Thus, they should be given rights to skip certain coursed irrelevant according to the career plan. For example, if a student’s career goal is farm manager, to get involved in this field, soil management skills or social skills would be much valuable, rather than painting or drawing skills.
In conclusion, I highly support that high school should make art subjects selective, other than compulsory.
- Some people think that teenagers should concentrate on all subjects at school. Others believe that teenagers should focus on the subjects they are best at or they are most interested in. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- Some people think that teenagers should concentrate on all subjects at school. Others believe that teenagers should focus on the subjects they are best at or they are most interested in. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The graph shows the demand for energy and the energy available for fossil fuels in Freedonia from 1985 to 2005 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 93
- Air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world Ordinary people can get no advantage with the development of air travel To what extent do you agree or disagree 52
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hool students with nothing but drawbacks Art education would be far too success w...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54113924051 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85237899567 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623417721519 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9818771838 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.733333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269141298621 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826704278004 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540009194948 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172290934095 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020558652176 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.