Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
A highly debated issue today relates to weather to permit students at university level to decide any subject they like or let the college restrict the subjects they study as it is beneficial later in career life. In this essay, I am going to examine these questions from both points of view and then give my own opinion.
On one side of the argument, there are people who argue that the benefits of a defined curriculum by university considerably outweigh its advantages. The main reason for believing this is that college set those study options based one research and consultation of subject matter expert. It is also possible to say that, topics are related to the career path which student will practice after graduation. One good illustration of this is, students will be assigned task and duties in their future job, which they will easily complete, as they are well prepared back in college.
On the other hand, it is also possible to make the opposing case. It is often argued that in fact the selection of subjects can be widely open to the student choice. People often have this opinion because student will have the freedom to add subjects to study semester based on what topics they excel. A second point is that they can add topics from adjacent study fields to increase their chances of landing a job after leaving college. A particular good example here is Telecommunication and computer engineering as both are similar in some subjects.
In conclusion, I believe both arguments have their merits. On balance, however, I feel that university must set those subjects. This is because deciding those topics is critical and are set after careful consideration and revision by professors and experts from top companies.
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 61
- Percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 73
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 84
- Some people believe that it is a good idea to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, then, well, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94539249147 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63536484683 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569965870307 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1021624139 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293228515969 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877954406369 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534009906828 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170728926081 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572729298803 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.