Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, some museums charge admission fees while some do not. In my opinion, the merits of any entrance fees to the museums outweigh the drawbacks.
There are considerable benefits of charging entrance fees to the visitors of the museums. For the museums themselves, they can utilize that money to pay for the operation cost and to develop the museums by adding more sections. Moreover, museums can help boosting tourism for the country as they attract and encourage other nations to travel. For example, Netherlands is famous with its wide range of museums in art, history, and technology, as a result, in 2015 around 18 million tourist visited the country and it was estimated that the country gain 2 billion euros.
However, there are potential drawbacks for charging entrance tickets fees. The main issue is that most of the visitors are students. This can hold them back from visiting museums, as they will not be able to afford the ticket. For example, my sister tend to visit museums on regular bases to gain knowledge and sometimes to complete an assignment related to historical topic. If museums were charging entrance fees, she would not be able to visit them and she would opt for something cheaper such as getting the information from the internet.
I conclusion, although admission charge will hold certain type of visitors to the museums, however, the merits of setting tariff for museum entrance seem to outweigh the drawbacks as it can assist the museum with its running cost and encourage more tourist into the country.
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 61
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 84
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the percentage of greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, 56
- Some people believe that it is a good idea to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to boost' or 'boost'.
Suggestion: to boost; boost
...re sections. Moreover, museums can help boosting tourism for the country as they attract...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 544, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ting the information from the internet. I conclusion, although admission charge ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1296.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04280155642 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53604576219 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548638132296 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.299375753 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348732274401 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129448150243 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843475224036 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227535811905 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422647080416 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.