Some people think that the government should take care of disadvantaged people such as the unemployed and homeless people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Jobless youth and homeless individuals are a big concern of worry to the society. Some individuals believe that the state needs to take the responsibility of poor people, such as, individuals without a job and a displaced persons. In my opinion, saving lives of homeless people is essential. Although, protecting unemployed youth financially can devalue the importance of job among working individuals.
Many orphan children are forced to become beggars or perform criminal activities by lawbreakers. It is often observed that juvenile involvement in criminal activities as rules and regulations for them are not that strict as compare with adults, therefore, they are being harassed to perform offending tasks by adult offenders to earn money. Currently on the records of Mumbai police has proven the homeless youngster’s involvement in crime scene is huge in numbers.
On the other hand, financial support from state to unemployed youth will never encourage him to search for a new job. Wealth is the prime factor for a working individual, consequently provide such benefits to jobless youth and without any work will make them lazy to duties and responsibilities. From the records of employment ministry, reason to change the jobs by an individual is often the low wages. Hence, the care from government to unemployed youth will make them less ambitious.
In conclusion, backing jobless youth by the government can make them lethargic to their duties and goals. Moreover, protecting homeless youth is essential to break the backbone of criminal minded people. Hence, I disagree and believe that the support from a government can be destructive for some individuals as a whole.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-15 | bhatvishal@ | 61 | view |
- Technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the modern world. In the not too distant future, technology will completely replace a teacher in the classroom. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- Leader and directors in an organization are normally older people. Some people think younger leader would be better. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the modern world. In the not too distant future, technology will completely replace a teacher in the classroom. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- Leader and directors in an organization are normally older people. Some people think younger leader would be better. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Children do not respect their parents as much as they did in the past. This behaviour is now having a negative impact on society. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... lives of homeless people is essential. Although, protecting unemployed youth financiall...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment in crime scene is huge in numbers. On the other hand, financial support fro...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uctive for some individuals as a whole.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35205992509 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03662411274 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565543071161 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2571336346 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.071428571 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145266432657 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527312604861 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461198388999 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0884291925307 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549618150212 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.