The charts below show the result of a survey of adult education. The first chart shows the reason why adults decide to study. The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared.
The charts illustrate the final output of data collection about adult education. The first chart demonstrates the factor which decides the adults to have education, whereas the pie chart describes, the people thought for paying education fee by the taxpayer, individual, and employer.
Overall, Maximum people are gaining education because of their interest and for the qualifications, also the people think the greatest ratio of the fee should be paid by themselves than others.
According to the graph, 40% of the students are achieving degree because of their interest in the subject and just 2% fewer scholars pursue gaining the qualification. The number of people who are studying for helping their jobs is 22%, and 20% of others are extending their educational level for getting promotions, the same ratio of students are studying for learning. Just more than a tenth people are achieving the degree to change their job and very few of them are joining just to meet the people.
Again from the pie chart, The people believed that the individual themselves are responsible for paying 40% of their fee, where employers and taxpayers are responsible for paying just more than a third and a quartile respectively.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- Teenage offenders should be treated in the same way as adult criminals.Do you agree? 67
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave-energy machine and its location.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 84
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18686868687 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75043011728 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.4573922759 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.714285714 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2857142857 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193716757281 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106238815661 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106035587782 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138319537766 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126820460278 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.